<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MaxxoMedia Digital Media and Entertainment Trends &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maxxomedia.com/blog/tag/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maxxomedia.com/blog</link>
	<description>Tracking the ever changing tides of digital media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 21:51:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Warner Music Group &#8211; Music as a Service Plans</title>
		<link>http://www.maxxomedia.com/blog/warner-music-group-music-as-a-service-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.maxxomedia.com/blog/warner-music-group-music-as-a-service-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Levy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxxomedia.com/blog/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an article from Slate about a proposed plan by Warner Music Group to fight piracy and in essence give the people what they want &#8211; freedom to download whatever they want, DRM free and share it all they want for a flat rate fee every month. I actually like the idea to a point. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an <a title="The Music Industry's Extortion Scheme" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2189888/pagenum/all/#page_start" target="_blank">article </a>from Slate about a proposed plan by Warner Music Group  to fight piracy and in essence give the people what they want &#8211; freedom to download whatever they want, DRM free and share it all they want for a flat rate fee every month.  </p>
<p>I actually like the idea to a point.  I&#8217;ve been a Rhapsody subscriber for years and find great value in the subscription model.  The underlying question I have in the Warner plan is if the music is freely shared all around the net, how do they account and pay to the artists who work so hard to produce the music in the first place.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think.</p>
<p><span id="more-279"></span></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;<br />
<h3>The Music Industry&#8217;s Extortion Scheme by Reihan Salam</h3>
<p>
<h3><span class="h1_subhead">The record labels want you to pay a tax on music. It&#8217;s not as horrible as it sounds.</span></h3>
<p><span class="dateline"> </span><span class="topimage" style="width: 155px;"><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2190071/"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 2px; float: left;" src="http://img.slate.com/media/1/123125/123050/2180573/2188133/080425_CB_musicTN.jpg" alt="Illustration by Rob Donnelly. Click image to expand." height="188" width="155" /></a></span></p>
<p>What would you do if a bully—let&#8217;s call him &#8220;Joey Giggles&#8221;—kept snatching your ice-cream cone? OK, now what if Joey Giggles then told you, &#8220;If you pay me five bucks a month, I&#8217;ll stop snatching your ice cream.&#8221; Depending on how much you hate getting beaten up, and how much you love ice-cream cones, you might decide that caving in is the way to go. This is what&#8217;s called a protection racket. It&#8217;s also potentially the new model for how we&#8217;ll buy and listen to music.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s back up for a second. Four companies (Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, Sony BMG, and EMI) control a staggering 90 percent of all record sales in the United States, and they&#8217;re hopping mad. CD sales are in free fall, and the recording industry&#8217;s revenues have shrunk from $15 billion to $10 billion in less than a decade. Instead of blaming themselves for failing to embrace the Internet soon enough, Big Music has pointed the finger at piracy, shaking down scofflaw MP3 downloaders with capricious, multimillion-dollar lawsuits. This has not strengthened the record companies&#8217; position—at this point, they&#8217;re losing money <em>and</em> everybody hates them.</p>
<p>Now Big Music is mulling the Joey Giggles approach. Warner Music Group is trying to rally the rest of the industry behind <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/03/27/Warners-New-Web-Guru" target="_blank">a plan</a> to charge Internet service providers $5 per customer per month, an amount that would be added to your Internet bill. In exchange, music lovers would get all the online tunes they want, meaning that anyone who spends more than $60 a year on music will come out way ahead. Download whatever you want and pay nothing! No more DRM! Swap files to your heart&#8217;s content—we promise, we won&#8217;t sue you (or snatch your ice-cream cone)!  <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2189888/pagenum/all/#page_start">More</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.maxxomedia.com%2Fblog%2Fwarner-music-group-music-as-a-service-plans%2F&amp;title=Warner%20Music%20Group%20%26%238211%3B%20Music%20as%20a%20Service%20Plans" id="wpa2a_2">Share/Bookmark</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.maxxomedia.com/blog/warner-music-group-music-as-a-service-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

